Author Question: A landlord's substantial interference with a tenant's use of the property is considered A)a ... (Read 114 times)

NguyenJ · **on:** Jun 24, 2018

A landlord's substantial interference with a tenant's use of the property is considered
A)a constructive eviction.
B)a tort.
C)a violation of federal housing law.
D)permissible in a periodic tenancy.

Question 2

In Briggs and Stratton Corp v. Baldridge, Briggs was blacklisted by Arab countries because of its compliance with U.S. anti-boycott regulations. Briggs subsequently brought a lawsuit claiming damages as a result of U.S. government action. Specifically, Briggs demanded just compensation under the Fifth Amendment takings clause. The court:
A) invoked sovereign immunity to avoid taking subject matter jurisdiction.
B) refused relief because the amount of damages was speculative, at best.
C) refused relief because Briggs's property had not been seized or restrained.
D) allowed relief, since Briggs could demonstrate a complete taking of certain contractual opportunities and reasonable investment expectations.
E)refused relief because Briggs lacked standing.