Walter enters a dentist office and points to a damaged tooth. The dentist, Matt, treats the tooth. If Walter refused to pay and Matt sued,
A)Walter would win as there was no contract.
B)Walter would win because of the UCC.
C)Matt would win; this is an implied contract.
D)Matt would win in quantum meruit.
Question 2
In Dayan v. McDonald's Corporation, the court ruled that:
A) McDonald's quality standards were inadequate under French law.
B) the McDonald's franchise contract was illegal under French law.
C) McDonald's had fulfilled its responsibility to the franchisee in France under U.S. law.
D) the French do not like hamburgers.
Tooth
human skin and pressure points
Results from sequential study of two cohorts tested at three ages and at three different points in t
Observed Mother–Child Arguments at Five Time Points Over an Eight-Year Period
Topics of Review for Front-Office Personnel
Contents of Office Policies and Procedures Manual