This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: According to Van Camp, Olen, and Barry the best way to examine a moral argument is to treat it as: ... (Read 65 times)

Kikoku

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 540

According to Van Camp, Olen, and Barry the best way to examine a moral argument is
  to treat it as:


 
 

a. an abbreviated deductive argument
  b. an abbreviated inductive argument
  c. a sound deductive argument
  d. a warranted inductive argument



Question 2

A sound argument is a:
 
 

a. warranted inductive argument
  b. deductive argument that makes sense
  c. valid deductive argument with true premises
  d. none of the above




Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

tuwy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 336
Answer to Question 1

a.

Answer to Question 2

c.




Kikoku

  • Member
  • Posts: 540
Reply 2 on: Jun 19, 2018
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review


kalskdjl1212

  • Member
  • Posts: 353
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Great answer, keep it coming :)

 

Did you know?

Asthma is the most common chronic childhood disease in the world. Most children who develop asthma have symptoms before they are 5 years old.

Did you know?

Walt Disney helped combat malaria by making an animated film in 1943 called The Winged Scourge. This short film starred the seven dwarfs and taught children that mosquitos transmit malaria, which is a very bad disease. It advocated the killing of mosquitos to stop the disease.

Did you know?

About 80% of major fungal systemic infections are due to Candida albicans. Another form, Candida peritonitis, occurs most often in postoperative patients. A rare disease, Candida meningitis, may follow leukemia, kidney transplant, other immunosuppressed factors, or when suffering from Candida septicemia.

Did you know?

Asthma cases in Americans are about 75% higher today than they were in 1980.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library