This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Define a forced-choice scale and explain why a researcher would use one and the potential negative ... (Read 40 times)

folubunmi

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 524
Define a forced-choice scale and explain why a researcher would use one and the potential negative consequence of that choice of scale.

Question 2

Engel's laws state that as a family's income rises, the percentage of the money spent on food will increase.
 
 Indicate whether the statement is true or false



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

jaymee143

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 341
Answer to Question 1

A forced-choice rating scale is a fixed-alternative scale that requires respondents to choose one of the fixed alternatives. The argument for forced choice is that people really do have attitudes, even if they are unfamiliar with them and should be required to answer the question. However, the use of forced-choice questions is associated with higher incidence of no answer..

Answer to Question 2

F




folubunmi

  • Member
  • Posts: 524
Reply 2 on: Jun 29, 2018
Wow, this really help


kishoreddi

  • Member
  • Posts: 329
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Gracias!

 

Did you know?

HIV testing reach is still limited. An estimated 40% of people with HIV (more than 14 million) remain undiagnosed and do not know their infection status.

Did you know?

Human stomach acid is strong enough to dissolve small pieces of metal such as razor blades or staples.

Did you know?

Fungal nail infections account for up to 30% of all skin infections. They affect 5% of the general population—mostly people over the age of 70.

Did you know?

There are approximately 3 million unintended pregnancies in the United States each year.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library