Author Question: Is it possible for average total cost to be decreasing over a range of output where marginal cost is ... (Read 172 times)

cabate

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 537
Is it possible for average total cost to be decreasing over a range of output where marginal cost is increasing? Briefly explain.
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Some economists have argued that path dependence and switching costs can lead to market failure. Which of the following is an example of this argument?
 
  A) VHS video recorders became more popular with consumers than Sony Betamax recorders even though the Betamax recorders embodied a superior technology.
  B) A consumer who won a lottery for a Super Bowl ticket refuses to sell it for 3,000 even though he would not have paid 3,000 for a ticket if he had not won the lottery.
  C) Costly celebrity endorsements lead many consumers to buy a product even though it is more expensive or less effective than a product that is not endorsed by a celebrity.
  D) While playing the ultimate game, an allocator decides to share 20 equally with a recipient rather than keep the 20 for herself.


fraziera112

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 356
Answer to Question 1

Yes. As long as the marginal cost is below the average total cost, average total cost will be decreasing.

Answer to Question 2

A



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Thyroid conditions cause a higher risk of fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome.

Did you know?

The most common treatment options for addiction include psychotherapy, support groups, and individual counseling.

Did you know?

Nearly 31 million adults in America have a total cholesterol level that is more than 240 mg per dL.

Did you know?

Symptoms of kidney problems include a loss of appetite, back pain (which may be sudden and intense), chills, abdominal pain, fluid retention, nausea, the urge to urinate, vomiting, and fever.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library