In the case of Davis v. North Carolina, where Davis was held ...

[james]

In the case of Davis v. North Carolina, where Davis was held incommunicado for 16 hours,
 
  A. his confession was ruled voluntary by the state and federal courts.
  B. his confession was ruled involuntary by the state and federal courts.
  C. his confession was ruled voluntary by the state court and involuntary by the federal court.
  D. his confession was ruled involuntary by the state court and voluntary by the federal court.

Question 2

In the Supreme Court case of Arizona v. Fulminante, it was decided that
 
  A. deceit during an interrogation is legal.
  B. confessions obtained without the issuance of Miranda warnings are admissible.
  C. a coerced confession can be admitted if there is sufficient other evidence of guilt.
  D. a coerced confession is never admissible.

[bd5255]

Answer to Question 1

A

Answer to Question 2

C