In the Kelly Michaels' case, social scientists prepared an amicus ...

[WWatsford]

In the Kelly Michaels' case, social scientists prepared an amicus brief
 
  A. dealing with the suggestible nature of the interviewing procedures.
  B. questioning the child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome.
  C. offering support for ultimate-opinion testimony being admitted into trial.
  D. arguing that an expert for the prosecution had gone beyond acceptable limits in her testimony.

Question 2

The use of general conclusions from social science research to determine factual issues in a specific case is called
 
  A. criterion-based content analysis.
  B. statement validity analysis.
  C. social context testimony.
  D. social framework testimony.

[scrocafella]

Answer to Question 1

A

Answer to Question 2

D

[WWatsford]

Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

[coreycathey]

Excellent