This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Suppose you are offered a gamble in which you win 1,000 1/3 half the time but lose 800 2/3 half the ... (Read 123 times)

rachel9

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 495
Suppose you are offered a gamble in which you win 1,000 1/3 half the time but lose 800 2/3 half the time. If you are risk lover will you take the gamble? What will your expected payoff be?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Using an equation, explain why governments prefer to avoid excessive current account surpluses?
 
  What will be an ideal response?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

akpaschal

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 342
Answer to Question 1

The expected payoff would be:
1/3 (+1,000 ) + 2/3 (-800 ) = -200.
From this calculation, we know that risk-neutral individuals would not take the gamble, but it is not clear what a risk-loving individual would do.

Answer to Question 2

This follows from the national income identity, S = CA + I, which says that total domestic savings, S, is divided between foreign asset accumulation, CA, and domestic investment, I.




rachel9

  • Member
  • Posts: 495
Reply 2 on: Jun 30, 2018
Excellent


ultraflyy23

  • Member
  • Posts: 312
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Great answer, keep it coming :)

 

Did you know?

Many people have small pouches in their colons that bulge outward through weak spots. Each pouch is called a diverticulum. About 10% of Americans older than age 40 years have diverticulosis, which, when the pouches become infected or inflamed, is called diverticulitis. The main cause of diverticular disease is a low-fiber diet.

Did you know?

Multiple experimental evidences have confirmed that at the molecular level, cancer is caused by lesions in cellular DNA.

Did you know?

Women are two-thirds more likely than men to develop irritable bowel syndrome. This may be attributable to hormonal changes related to their menstrual cycles.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

Did you know?

Nearly 31 million adults in America have a total cholesterol level that is more than 240 mg per dL.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library