This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: The ability to set a price greater than marginal cost guarantees an economic profit for the ... (Read 12 times)

CORALGRILL2014

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 525
The ability to set a price greater than marginal cost guarantees an economic profit for the monopolistic competitor (assuming P > AC).
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

The marginal expenditure of a monopsonist is 4. The wage it currently pays is 3. The labor supply curve has a constant elasticity. What is the elasticity of the labor supply?
 
  A) 0.33
  B) 0.66
  C) 1
  D) 3



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

wfdfwc23

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 338
Answer to Question 1

False. Although the firm is a price setter entry in the long run will drive price down until no economic profit exists.

Answer to Question 2

A




CORALGRILL2014

  • Member
  • Posts: 525
Reply 2 on: Jul 1, 2018
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it


LVPMS

  • Member
  • Posts: 323
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
:D TYSM

 

Did you know?

The most destructive flu epidemic of all times in recorded history occurred in 1918, with approximately 20 million deaths worldwide.

Did you know?

Drug-induced pharmacodynamic effects manifested in older adults include drug-induced renal toxicity, which can be a major factor when these adults are experiencing other kidney problems.

Did you know?

Increased intake of vitamin D has been shown to reduce fractures up to 25% in older people.

Did you know?

More than 2,500 barbiturates have been synthesized. At the height of their popularity, about 50 were marketed for human use.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library