Author Question: If a city decides to lift restrictions of how many taxi cabs can operate, social welfare will ... (Read 575 times)

penza

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,022
If a city decides to lift restrictions of how many taxi cabs can operate, social welfare will increase.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

Policies that restrict supply could generate an increase in social welfare because the increase in producer surplus could exceed the decrease in consumer surplus.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false



cpetit11

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 321
Answer to Question 1

True . Even though turning producer surplus into consumer surplus doesn't increase total welfare, the elimination of the deadweight loss that resulted from the limit does.

Answer to Question 2

False. One impact of a supply restriction is an exchange from consumers to producers. The net effect on social welfare is negative. Additionally, there is a deadweight loss. This is the additional surplus that could be generated if supply were not restricted. This effect is always negative. As a result, social welfare always declines in response to a supply restriction.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Fungal nail infections account for up to 30% of all skin infections. They affect 5% of the general population—mostly people over the age of 70.

Did you know?

Since 1988, the CDC has reported a 99% reduction in bacterial meningitis caused by Haemophilus influenzae, due to the introduction of the vaccine against it.

Did you know?

Approximately 25% of all reported medication errors result from some kind of name confusion.

Did you know?

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) was originally known as the Communicable Disease Center, which was formed to fight malaria. It was originally headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, since the Southern states faced the worst threat from malaria.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library