In the Stackelberg model, suppose the first-mover has MR = 15 - Q1, the second firm has reaction function Q2 = 15 - Q1/2, and production occurs at zero marginal cost.
Why doesn't the first-mover announce that its production is Q1 = 30 in order to exclude the second firm from the market (i.e., Q2 = 0 in this case)? A) In this case, MR is negative and is less than MC, so the first-mover would be producing less than the optimal quantity.
B) In this case, MR is negative and is less than MC, so the first-mover would be producing too much output.
C) This is a possible outcome from the Stackelberg duopoly under these conditions.
D) We do not have enough information to determine if this is an optimal outcome for this case.
Question 2
A firm has two customers and creates a two-part tariff with a usage fee (P) that exceeds the marginal cost of production and leaves each customer with positive consumer surplus such that CS2 > CS1 > 0.
If the firm sets the entry fee equal to CS2, then the number of customers that actually buy the product is equal to: A) zero.
B) one.
C) two.
D) We don't have enough information to answer this question.
The wild radish, Raphanus sativus, has become a model for studying the mating behaviour of plants.
Lab: Amoeba Model
One-handed kneading. Tissues are lifted with the whole hand in firm contact.
Binding change model for ATP synthase
Effect of “Moral Restraint” in the Malthusian Model
Which reaction below represents Th decay by alpha emission?