This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Suppose group price discrimination is possible but a firm chooses not to and sets the same price in ... (Read 132 times)

jc611

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 552
Suppose group price discrimination is possible but a firm chooses not to and sets the same price in each market. As a result
 
  A) price elasticity of demand is the same in each market.
  B) the price-inelastic market will buy zero units.
  C) marginal revenue in the more price-elastic market exceeds marginal revenue in the less price-elastic market.
  D) the deadweight loss is less than if the firm price discriminated.

Question 2

If a firm does NOT know its rival's profit function, then we consider that information to be
 
  A) irrelevant in deciding its best strategy.
  B) private.
  C) common knowledge.
  D) Pareto sub-optimal.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

vseab

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 323
Answer to Question 1

C

Answer to Question 2

B




jc611

  • Member
  • Posts: 552
Reply 2 on: Jul 1, 2018
Great answer, keep it coming :)


rachel

  • Member
  • Posts: 323
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
:D TYSM

 

Did you know?

According to animal studies, the typical American diet is damaging to the liver and may result in allergies, low energy, digestive problems, and a lack of ability to detoxify harmful substances.

Did you know?

An identified risk factor for osteoporosis is the intake of excessive amounts of vitamin A. Dietary intake of approximately double the recommended daily amount of vitamin A, by women, has been shown to reduce bone mineral density and increase the chances for hip fractures compared with women who consumed the recommended daily amount (or less) of vitamin A.

Did you know?

In the United States, an estimated 50 million unnecessary antibiotics are prescribed for viral respiratory infections.

Did you know?

Human stomach acid is strong enough to dissolve small pieces of metal such as razor blades or staples.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library