Author Question: Sanderson and Alderson argue the following about an ecological and economic collapse a. given new ... (Read 61 times)

09madisonrousseau09

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 559
Sanderson and Alderson argue the following about an ecological and economic collapse
 
  a. given new technological advancements, it seems very unlikely in the coming century
  b. it is probably the biggest threat to humankind on a global scale
  c. we should expect to see a total ecological and economic collapse within the next 50 years
  d. none of these

Question 2

Some scholars, such as Christopher Chase-Dunn, think that a world-annihilating war may only be avoidable through the establishment of
 
  a. a protective war tribunal
  b. world-scale economic organizations such as the WTO
  c. a multi-country constitution promising permanent disarmament
  d. a world state



iceage

  • Guest
Answer to Question 1

a

Answer to Question 2

d



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

The use of salicylates dates back 2,500 years to Hippocrates’s recommendation of willow bark (from which a salicylate is derived) as an aid to the pains of childbirth. However, overdosage of salicylates can harm body fluids, electrolytes, the CNS, the GI tract, the ears, the lungs, the blood, the liver, and the kidneys and cause coma or death.

Did you know?

More than 150,000 Americans killed by cardiovascular disease are younger than the age of 65 years.

Did you know?

After 5 years of being diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis, one every three patients will no longer be able to work.

Did you know?

Serum cholesterol testing in adults is recommended every 1 to 5 years. People with diabetes and a family history of high cholesterol should be tested even more frequently.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library