This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Why have some schools in the United States discarded the concept of formalized ability grouping? ... (Read 43 times)

APUS57

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 571
Why have some schools in the United States discarded the concept of formalized ability grouping?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

According to the interactionist perspective, what are the consequences of labeling?
 
  What will be an ideal response?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

Ptupou85

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 334
Answer to Question 1

The danger in tracking is that the track becomes a label that creates expectations on the part of both the teacher and the students regarding how well individual students are capable of performing. Teachers may tend to encourage performances that are consistent with the track a student is in, and students assume that being placed in a track indicates the performance level of which they are capable. In addition, research shows that lower-class students and minority students are considerably more likely to be placed in the lower tracks than other students, even among students of equal abilities and performance levels. This suggests that tracking decisions are made, at least in part, on the basis of stereotypes about social class and race, and that racism may influence the outcome. It certainly raises troubling questions about how fair the process is. Because of these problems, some schools have discarded formalized ability grouping.

Answer to Question 2

According to the interactionist perspective, labeling can have serious consequences for students.
Labeling a person as a deviant, for example, can serve as a self-fulfilling prophecy when people begin to conform to the expectations of the labels attached to them. Likewise, a similar process can occur in the classroom when teachers label students as bright or dull. When students are so labeled, teachers may treat them differently, possibly giving the students who are labeled bright a little more encouragement and assistance. In addition, those labeled dull may assume that there is some truth in the label and may not try very hard. The result of both the students' and the teachers' reactions may be reinforcement of the label, or a self-fulfilling prophecy as the labelers create what they thought they were merely identifying in the first place. Schools, then, become a social problem when these face-to-face educational encounters produce stigmatizing results, lower students' self-esteem, and make educational success more difficult to achieve.




APUS57

  • Member
  • Posts: 571
Reply 2 on: Jul 2, 2018
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review


cam1229

  • Member
  • Posts: 329
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
:D TYSM

 

Did you know?

The most common childhood diseases include croup, chickenpox, ear infections, flu, pneumonia, ringworm, respiratory syncytial virus, scabies, head lice, and asthma.

Did you know?

The human body's pharmacokinetics are quite varied. Our hair holds onto drugs longer than our urine, blood, or saliva. For example, alcohol can be detected in the hair for up to 90 days after it was consumed. The same is true for marijuana, cocaine, ecstasy, heroin, methamphetamine, and nicotine.

Did you know?

After 5 years of being diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis, one every three patients will no longer be able to work.

Did you know?

Addicts to opiates often avoid treatment because they are afraid of withdrawal. Though unpleasant, with proper management, withdrawal is rarely fatal and passes relatively quickly.

Did you know?

Approximately 70% of expectant mothers report experiencing some symptoms of morning sickness during the first trimester of pregnancy.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library