Material cost variances, use of variances for performance ...

[kfurse]

Material cost variances, use of variances for performance evaluation.
 
  Katharine Johnson is the owner of Best Bikes, a company that produces high-quality cross-country bicycles. Best Bikes participates in a supply chain that consists of suppliers, manufacturers, distributors, and elite bicycle shops. For several years Best Bikes has purchased titanium from suppliers in the supply chain. Best Bikes uses titanium for the bicycle frames because it is stronger and lighter than other metals and therefore increases the quality of the bicycle. Earlier this year, Best Bikes hired Michael Bentfield, a recent graduate from State University, as purchasing manager. Michael believed that he could reduce costs if he purchased titanium from an online marketplace at a lower price.
   Best Bikes established the following standards based upon the company's experience with previous suppliers. The standards are as follows:
 
  Actual results for the first month using the online supplier of titanium are as follows:
 
  Required:
  1. Compute the direct materials price and efficiency variances.
  2. What factors can explain the variances identified in requirement 1? Could any other variances be affected?
  3. Was switching suppliers a good idea for Best Bikes? Explain why or why not.
  4. Should Michael Bentfield's performance evaluation be based solely on price variances? Should the production manager's evaluation be based solely on efficiency variances? Why is it important for Katharine Johnson to understand the causes of a variance before she evaluates performance?
  5. Other than performance evaluation, what reasons are there for calculating variances?
  6. What future problems could result from Best Bikes' decision to buy a lower quality of titanium from the online marketplace?

Question 2

Which of the following sequences of documents or records describes the proper sequence in the accounting cycle?
 a. Source documents, journal, ledger, work sheet, financial statements
   b. Source documents, work sheet, journal, ledger, financial statements
   c. Source documents, ledger, journal, work sheet, financial statements
   d. Work sheet, source documents, financial statements, ledger, journal
   e. Financial statements, journal, ledger, source documents, work sheet

[234sdffa]

Answer to Question 1

1. Materials Variances

Actual Costs
Incurred
(Actual Input Qty.
 Actual Price)

Actual Input Qty.
 Budgeted Price Flexible Budget
(Budgeted Input Qty. Allowed
for Actual Output
 Budgeted Price)

Direct
Materials
(5,200  17a)
88,400 Purchases Usage
(5,200  18) (4,700  18)
93,600 84,600
(400  8  18)
(3,200  18)
57,600

5,200 F 27,000 U
Price variance Efficiency variance

a 88,400 5,200 = 17

2. The favorable price variance is due to the 1 difference (18  17) between the standard price based on the previous suppliers and the actual price paid through the online marketplace. The unfavorable efficiency variance could be due to several factors including inexperienced workers and machine malfunctions. But the likely cause here is that the lower-priced titanium was lower quality or less refined, which led to more waste. The labor efficiency variance could be affected if the lower quality titanium caused the workers to use more time.

3. Switching suppliers was not a good idea. The 5,200 savings in the cost of titanium was outweighed by the 27,000 extra material usage. In addition, the 27,000 U efficiency variance does not recognize the total impact of the lower quality titanium because, of the 5,200 pounds purchased, only 4,700 pounds were used. If the quantity of materials used in production is relatively the same, Best Bikes could expect the remaining 500 lbs to produce approximately 40 more units. At standard, 40 more units should take 40  8 = 320 lbs. There could be an additional unfavorable efficiency variance of

(500  18) (40  8  18)
9,000 5,760

3,240U

4. The purchasing manager's performance evaluation should not be based solely on the price variance. The short-run reduction in purchase costs was more than offset by higher usage rates. His evaluation should be based on the total costs of the company as a whole. In addition, the production manager's performance evaluation should not be based solely on the efficiency variances. In this case, the production manager was not responsible for the purchase of the lower-quality titanium, which led to the unfavorable efficiency scores. In general, it is important for Johnson to understand that not all favorable material price
variances are good news because of the negative effects that can arise in the production process from the purchase of inferior inputs. They can lead to unfavorable efficiency variances for both materials and labor. Johnson should also that understand efficiency variances may arise for many different reasons and she needs to know these reasons before evaluating performance.

5. Variances should be used to help Best Bikes understand what led to the current set of financial results, as well as how to perform better in the future. They are a way to facilitate the continuous improvement efforts of the company. Rather than focusing solely on the price of titanium, Scott can balance price and quality in future purchase decisions.

6. Future problems can arise in the supply chain. Bentfield may need to go back to the previous suppliers. But Best Bikes' relationship with them may have been damaged, and they may now be selling all their available titanium to other manufacturers. Lower quality bicycles could also affect Best Bikes' reputation with the distributors, the bike shops, and customers, leading to higher warranty claims and customer dissatisfaction, and decreased sales in the future.

Answer to Question 2

a

[kfurse]

Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

[cam1229]

Great answer, keep it coming