[Answered] Since each organization faces a different set of contingencies, there is no one best way to design ...

This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Since each organization faces a different set of contingencies, there is no one best way to design ... (Read 69 times)

karen

Hero Member
Posts: 537

on: Jul 7, 2018

Since each organization faces a different set of contingencies, there is no one best way to design an organization.

Question 2

If the environment is stable, an organization is more likely to decentralize authority and empower its employees to make important operating decisions.

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question

Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

k.lashomb

Sr. Member
Posts: 346

Reply #1 on: Jul 7, 2018

Answer to Question 1

Answer to Question 2

karen

Member
Posts: 537

Reply 2 on: Jul 7, 2018

Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

juliaf

Member
Posts: 344

Reply 3 on: Yesterday

Gracias!

« previous next »

Did you know?

The FDA recognizes 118 routes of administration.

Did you know?

Vaccines prevent between 2.5 and 4 million deaths every year.

Did you know?

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) was originally known as the Communicable Disease Center, which was formed to fight malaria. It was originally headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, since the Southern states faced the worst threat from malaria.

Did you know?

According to the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, lung disease is the third leading killer in the United States, responsible for one in seven deaths. It is the leading cause of death among infants under the age of one year.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).