This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: What are the advantages of distributed practice over massed learning? What are the disadvantages? ... (Read 66 times)

londonang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 540
What are the advantages of distributed practice over massed learning? What are the disadvantages? Explain.
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Compare the two main theories of forgettingdecay theory and interference theoryand compare their research support.
 
  What will be an ideal response?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

firehawk60

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 315
Answer to Question 1

Our memories tend to be good when we use distributed practice, learning in which various sessions are spaced over time. Our memories for information are not as good when the information is acquired through massed practice, learning in which sessions are crammed together in a very short space of time. The greater the distribution of learning trials over time, the more the participants remembered over long periods. To maximize the effect on long-term recall, the spacing should ideally be distributed over months, rather than days or weeks. This effect is termed the spacing effect. Thus the primary advantage is improved recall while the primary disadvantage is the amount of time over which the practice must occur.

Answer to Question 2

Interference theory refers to forgetting that occurs because recall of certain information interferes with recall of other information. Retroactive interference (or retroactive inhibition) occurs when newly acquired knowledge impedes the recall of older material.

Proactive interference (or proactive inhibition) occurs when material that was learned in the past impedes the learning of new material.

Decay theory asserts that information is forgotten because of the gradual disappearance, rather than displacement, of the memory trace. Thus, decay theory views the original piece of information as gradually disappearing unless something is done to keep it intact. This view contrasts with interference theory, in which one or more pieces of information block recall of another.

Evidence exists for both interference and decay, at least in short-term memory. There is some evidence for decay, but the evidence for interference is much stronger. For now, we can assume that interference accounts for most of the forgetting in short-term memory. However, the extent to which the interference is retroactive, pro- active, or both is unclear. In addition, interference also affects material in long-term memory, leading to memory distortion.




londonang

  • Member
  • Posts: 540
Reply 2 on: Jun 20, 2018
:D TYSM


upturnedfurball

  • Member
  • Posts: 334
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Excellent

 

Did you know?

Many supplement containers do not even contain what their labels say. There are many documented reports of products containing much less, or more, that what is listed on their labels. They may also contain undisclosed prescription drugs and even contaminants.

Did you know?

In ancient Rome, many of the richer people in the population had lead-induced gout. The reason for this is unclear. Lead poisoning has also been linked to madness.

Did you know?

Human stomach acid is strong enough to dissolve small pieces of metal such as razor blades or staples.

Did you know?

Although puberty usually occurs in the early teenage years, the world's youngest parents were two Chinese children who had their first baby when they were 8 and 9 years of age.

Did you know?

The U.S. Pharmacopeia Medication Errors Reporting Program states that approximately 50% of all medication errors involve insulin.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library