This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: What are the advantages of distributed practice over massed learning? What are the disadvantages? ... (Read 54 times)

londonang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 540
What are the advantages of distributed practice over massed learning? What are the disadvantages? Explain.
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Compare the two main theories of forgettingdecay theory and interference theoryand compare their research support.
 
  What will be an ideal response?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

firehawk60

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 315
Answer to Question 1

Our memories tend to be good when we use distributed practice, learning in which various sessions are spaced over time. Our memories for information are not as good when the information is acquired through massed practice, learning in which sessions are crammed together in a very short space of time. The greater the distribution of learning trials over time, the more the participants remembered over long periods. To maximize the effect on long-term recall, the spacing should ideally be distributed over months, rather than days or weeks. This effect is termed the spacing effect. Thus the primary advantage is improved recall while the primary disadvantage is the amount of time over which the practice must occur.

Answer to Question 2

Interference theory refers to forgetting that occurs because recall of certain information interferes with recall of other information. Retroactive interference (or retroactive inhibition) occurs when newly acquired knowledge impedes the recall of older material.

Proactive interference (or proactive inhibition) occurs when material that was learned in the past impedes the learning of new material.

Decay theory asserts that information is forgotten because of the gradual disappearance, rather than displacement, of the memory trace. Thus, decay theory views the original piece of information as gradually disappearing unless something is done to keep it intact. This view contrasts with interference theory, in which one or more pieces of information block recall of another.

Evidence exists for both interference and decay, at least in short-term memory. There is some evidence for decay, but the evidence for interference is much stronger. For now, we can assume that interference accounts for most of the forgetting in short-term memory. However, the extent to which the interference is retroactive, pro- active, or both is unclear. In addition, interference also affects material in long-term memory, leading to memory distortion.




londonang

  • Member
  • Posts: 540
Reply 2 on: Jun 20, 2018
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it


AngeliqueG

  • Member
  • Posts: 343
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
:D TYSM

 

Did you know?

More than 4.4billion prescriptions were dispensed within the United States in 2016.

Did you know?

Allergies play a major part in the health of children. The most prevalent childhood allergies are milk, egg, soy, wheat, peanuts, tree nuts, and seafood.

Did you know?

About one in five American adults and teenagers have had a genital herpes infection—and most of them don't know it. People with genital herpes have at least twice the risk of becoming infected with HIV if exposed to it than those people who do not have genital herpes.

Did you know?

More than 50% of American adults have oral herpes, which is commonly known as "cold sores" or "fever blisters." The herpes virus can be active on the skin surface without showing any signs or causing any symptoms.

Did you know?

Despite claims by manufacturers, the supplement known as Ginkgo biloba was shown in a study of more than 3,000 participants to be ineffective in reducing development of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease in older people.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library