Author Question: Some might say that coding is not as important as analysis or design since programming errors can be ... (Read 102 times)

vicky · **on:** Jul 7, 2018

Some might say that coding is not as important as analysis or design since programming errors can be identified and corrected easily. Do you agree with this statement? Why?

What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

The boundaries of a domain decide the scope of domain analysis and provide a conceptual framework for organizing the information system into subsystems that correspond to the business workflow.

Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Anna · **Reply #1 on:** Jul 7, 2018

Answer to Question 1

Coding is the realization of analysis and design: no code means no software. On the other hand, coding without robust analysis and design cannot lead to quality software. Both sides of the equation are equally important. Code is the brick and the mortar of a software product. High-quality software cannot result from low-quality code. Coding follows and depends on physical design. In turn, coding might force the physical design to change if it shows that certain design concepts are defective, missing, or ignorant of technological realities. As important as analysis and design are, coding should not be taken for granted. High-quality software cannot result from low-quality code.

Answer to Question 2

TRUE