Author Question: Compare and contrast the ethical leadership perspectives of Burns and Heifetz. What will be an ... (Read 104 times)

jman1234

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 560
Compare and contrast the ethical leadership perspectives of Burns and Heifetz.
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Describe some of the measures used to define servant leadership. How does servant leadership apply to you at this stage in your life?
 
  What will be an ideal response?



wfdfwc23

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 338
Answer to Question 1

Burns: Emphasis was first seen in transformational leadership in which values, morals, and needs of followers are foremost to the leader. Both Burns and Heifetz argue the importance of leaders engaging themselves with followers and helping them in their personal struggles regarding conflicting values. Heifetz: Emphasis on ethics is in helping followers confront conflict. This is seen in the adaptive leadership theory first and is applied to ethics in that it is the leader's responsibility to use authority appropriately.

Answer to Question 2

Altruistic ethical overtonesleaders should be attentive to the concerns of their followers. Includes social responsibility to be concerned with the have-nots and striving to remove inequalities and social injustices.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

The shortest mature adult human of whom there is independent evidence was Gul Mohammed in India. In 1990, he was measured in New Delhi and stood 22.5 inches tall.

Did you know?

Children of people with alcoholism are more inclined to drink alcohol or use hard drugs. In fact, they are 400 times more likely to use hard drugs than those who do not have a family history of alcohol addiction.

Did you know?

In 2012, nearly 24 milliion Americans, aged 12 and older, had abused an illicit drug, according to the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA).

Did you know?

In most cases, kidneys can recover from almost complete loss of function, such as in acute kidney (renal) failure.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library