The nursing student attempting to validate an Internet source ...

[Lobcity]

The nursing student attempting to validate an Internet source wonders whether the source's author is credible in the field. How can this student make this determination? (Select all that apply.)
 
  1. Review the author's credentials.
  2. Assume the author is credible because he or she is published on the Internet.
  3. Conduct a literature search using the author's name.
  4. Look for links to information about the author.
  5. Identify sites sponsored by the author individually as valid.

Question 2

The nursing instructor is analyzing the students in the clinical area to determine the level of doctrinal conversion process according to Davis. When analyzing these students in which order should the instructor make this analysis?
 
  1. Stable internalization
  2. Initial innocence work
  3. Increasing role simulation
  4. Provisional internalization
  5. Psyching out and role simulation
  6. Labeled recognition of incongruity

[mk6555]

Answer to Question 1

Correct Answer: 1, 3, 4

In order to assess an author's credibility, the student should review the author's credentials, conduct a literature search using the author's name, or look for links to information about the author. Just because an author is published on the Internet does not mean the author is credible. Authors that self-sponsor their Internet sites may not be credible.

Answer to Question 2

Correct Answer: 2, 6, 5, 3, 4, 1

Fred Davis describes a six-stage doctrinal conversion process among nursing students: Stage 1, initial innocence; Stage 2, labeled recognition of incongruity; Stage 3, psyching out and role simulation; Stage 4, increasing role simulation; Stage 5, provisional internalization; and Stage 6, stable internalization.

[Lobcity]

Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

[okolip]

Wow, this really help