A new researcher says, There is no previous information about this topic to include in a review of literature. Which response to this statement is most valid?
1. This is a common situation when researching interventions done for many years.
2. This may occur, but is a very rare occurrence.
3. The researcher is not trying hard enough to find information.
4. Evidence often exists but has not be documented.
Question 2
A nurse is very interested in conducting research on a specific topic. Review of the literature reveals that only two other studies on the topic have been done and the results of these studies are surprising to the nurse. This nurse should consider which plans going forward? Standard Text: Select all that apply.
1. Drop the idea of the research because it has already been done twice.
2. Conduct a replication of one of the previous studies.
3. Design a study on the topic with a different study instrument
4. Accept the surprising results without reservation
5. Repeat the study using more specific outcome measures
Key anatomical features of Homo habilis include reduced facial size, a parabolic palate, and some br
Review of Systems ROS
Topic Media
Results from Kliegl's study show that older adults can learn complex information-processing
Topic Media
Simplified diagram of information flow (the central dogma) from DNA to RNA