When critiquing qualitative research, it is important to: a. ...

[P68T]

When critiquing qualitative research, it is important to:
 
  a. analyze the researcher's adherence to qualitative standards of investigation.
  b. avoid comparison of the study with other published studies to prevent bias.
  c. emphasize study strengths over weaknesses.
  d. use the same approach for both qualitative and quantitative study critiques.

Question 2

As a research consumer reads through a research report, the logical flow and connection among the problem, purpose, and objectives are assessed. Which step of the critical appraisal process is described here?
 
  a. Analysis
  b. Comparison
  c. Comprehension
  d. Evaluation

[Sophiapenny]

Answer to Question 1

ANS: A
Critique of qualitative research is different from critique of quantitative research. The reviewer must understand the nuances of qualitative research to effectively evaluate the study against qualitative standards.
Comparison with other published studies is appropriate and does not necessarily bias the critique.
Because quantitative research and qualitative research are so different, different approaches to the critique of each is necessary.
Both strengths and weaknesses should be addressed equally.

Answer to Question 2

ANS: A
The analysis phase involves a critique of the logical links connecting one study element with another.
In the comparison phase of critical appraisal, the ideal is compared with the real. The extent to which the researcher followed the rules for an ideal study is evaluated.
The comprehension phase of critical appraisal involves understanding the terms and concepts in the report.
Evaluation of the study critique is establishing the quality of the study and its appropriateness for implementation in practice.