This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: List the advantages and disadvantages of using a standard rain gauge vs. weather radar to measure ... (Read 45 times)

rachel9

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 495
List the advantages and disadvantages of using a standard rain gauge vs. weather radar to measure precipitation.
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

A country has net in-migration if immigration numbers
 
  A) equal emigration numbers.
  B) exceed emigration numbers.
  C) correlate with phase 4 of the population transition.
  D) are less than net migration numbers.
  E) correlate with stage 3 of the epidemiological transition.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

blfontai

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 327
Answer to Question 1

Standard rain gauge: Highly accurate measurement of rainfall received on the ground. Collected only in the place where the gauge is located, and incapable of giving rain rates, intensity, or regional extent of rainfall. Must be read manually.
Weather radar: Detailed picture of rainfall intensity and location. Shows movement of the rainfall. Read digitally, provides spatially rich data. Cannot give specific rainfall amounts received on the ground.

Answer to Question 2

Answer: B




rachel9

  • Member
  • Posts: 495
Reply 2 on: Jul 14, 2018
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it


billybob123

  • Member
  • Posts: 336
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Gracias!

 

Did you know?

The immune system needs 9.5 hours of sleep in total darkness to recharge completely.

Did you know?

People with high total cholesterol have about two times the risk for heart disease as people with ideal levels.

Did you know?

Lower drug doses for elderly patients should be used first, with titrations of the dose as tolerated to prevent unwanted drug-related pharmacodynamic effects.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

Did you know?

Persons who overdose with cardiac glycosides have a better chance of overall survival if they can survive the first 24 hours after the overdose.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library