One key decision between the court decisions Hobson v. Hansen and Diana v. State Board of Education was that Hobson v. Hansen concerned
a) group ability tests while Diana v. State Board of Education concerned individual intelligence tests.
b) high school graduation while Diana v. State Board of Education concerned elementary school placement.
Review several ways that psychologists interface with the legal system in the field of forensic assessment
c) Mexican American students while Diana v. State Board of Education concerned African-American students.
Review several ways that psychologists interface with the legal system in the field of forensic assessment
d) literacy testing while Diana v. State Board of Education concerned IQ testing.
Review several ways that psychologists interface with the legal system in the field of forensic assessment
Question 2
A lawyer is defending a school system against charges of discrimination against minority children.
To support his contention that over-representation of minority children in EMR (educable mentally retarded) classes does not by itself prove discriminate, what case might he cite? a) Georgia NAACP v. Georgia
b) Larry P. v. Riles
Review several ways that psychologists interface with the legal system in the field of forensic assessment
c) Diana v. State Board
Review several ways that psychologists interface with the legal system in the field of forensic assessment
d) Hobson v. Hansen
Review several ways that psychologists interface with the legal system in the field of forensic assessment
Steady-state kinetic analysis of bisubstrate reactions
Intradermal drug administration: (b) the administration site is prepped Source: Pearson Education/PH
Changes in the Level of Education, 1975-2010
Diana Duyser’s Grilled Cheese
The Dual Court System