This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: The nineteenth-century growth of core states would not have been possible without the use of ... (Read 15 times)

rachel9

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 495
The nineteenth-century growth of core states would not have been possible without the use of colonies for foodstuffs, raw materials, and as markets for core-state products.
 
  Indicate whether this statement is true or false.

Question 2

Of this city's total population of 1.5 million, about one million are foreigners who are building it from a small fishing/trading port into a global service hub, with facilities for hosting the 2022 World Cup, and funded by oil and gas revenues.
 
  A) Aberdeen, Scotland.
  B) Doha, Qatar.
  C) Houston, Texas.
  D) Guangzhou, China.
  E) Sochi, Russia.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

reelove4eva

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 332
Answer to Question 1

TRUE

Answer to Question 2

Answer: B




rachel9

  • Member
  • Posts: 495
Reply 2 on: Jul 14, 2018
Gracias!


essyface1

  • Member
  • Posts: 347
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

 

Did you know?

About 80% of major fungal systemic infections are due to Candida albicans. Another form, Candida peritonitis, occurs most often in postoperative patients. A rare disease, Candida meningitis, may follow leukemia, kidney transplant, other immunosuppressed factors, or when suffering from Candida septicemia.

Did you know?

In 1835 it was discovered that a disease of silkworms known as muscardine could be transferred from one silkworm to another, and was caused by a fungus.

Did you know?

It is important to read food labels and choose foods with low cholesterol and saturated trans fat. You should limit saturated fat to no higher than 6% of daily calories.

Did you know?

After a vasectomy, it takes about 12 ejaculations to clear out sperm that were already beyond the blocked area.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library