Author Question: We do not need to accomplish things in life that are permanent in order to find meaning in life, ... (Read 68 times)

kaid0807

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 515

We do not need to accomplish things in life that are permanent in
  order to find meaning in life, according to Thomas Nagel.
 
 


 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false.

Question 2

Bertrand Russell believes that without God life can have no meaning.
 
 


 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false.



jaymee143

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 341
Answer to Question 1

T

Answer to Question 2

F



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Hypertension is a silent killer because it is deadly and has no significant early symptoms. The danger from hypertension is the extra load on the heart, which can lead to hypertensive heart disease and kidney damage. This occurs without any major symptoms until the high blood pressure becomes extreme. Regular blood pressure checks are an important method of catching hypertension before it can kill you.

Did you know?

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) was originally known as the Communicable Disease Center, which was formed to fight malaria. It was originally headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, since the Southern states faced the worst threat from malaria.

Did you know?

The senior population grows every year. Seniors older than 65 years of age now comprise more than 13% of the total population. However, women outlive men. In the 85-and-over age group, there are only 45 men to every 100 women.

Did you know?

To prove that stomach ulcers were caused by bacteria and not by stress, a researcher consumed an entire laboratory beaker full of bacterial culture. After this, he did indeed develop stomach ulcers, and won the Nobel Prize for his discovery.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library