Author Question: John Arthur agrees with Peter Singer that we are obligated to prevent something bad from ... (Read 62 times)

Yi-Chen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 550

John Arthur agrees with Peter Singer that we are obligated to
  prevent something bad from happening, if we are not thereby forced to sacrifice anything of comparable moral importance, but he disagrees with the conclusion Singer draws.
 
 


 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false.

Question 2

Peter Singer argues that the implications of our traditional moral
  categories, if carefully considered, are accurate and lead us to the
  conclusion that we ought to give money to relieve suffering due to
  famine.
 
 


 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false.



mohan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 362
Answer to Question 1

F

Answer to Question 2

F



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

The first successful kidney transplant was performed in 1954 and occurred in Boston. A kidney from an identical twin was transplanted into his dying brother's body and was not rejected because it did not appear foreign to his body.

Did you know?

To maintain good kidney function, you should drink at least 3 quarts of water daily. Water dilutes urine and helps prevent concentrations of salts and minerals that can lead to kidney stone formation. Chronic dehydration is a major contributor to the development of kidney stones.

Did you know?

Computer programs are available that crosscheck a new drug's possible trade name with all other trade names currently available. These programs detect dangerous similarities between names and alert the manufacturer of the drug.

Did you know?

In inpatient settings, adverse drug events account for an estimated one in three of all hospital adverse events. They affect approximately 2 million hospital stays every year, and prolong hospital stays by between one and five days.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library