Author Question: A cost-benefit analysis of the acid rain prevention programs shows that A) there was no net ... (Read 75 times)

faduma

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 528
A cost-benefit analysis of the acid rain prevention programs shows that
 
  A) there was no net economic benefit.
  B) there was a large benefit and savings compared to costs.
  C) there was a large loss because costs far outweighed benefits.
  D) with vastly increased spending, the program could show a net benefit.

Question 2

Although acid precipitation has been reduced over the past two decades, progress has been slowed by
 
  A) U.S. Supreme Court rulings that are very favorable to the energy industry.
  B) the increased use of gasoline that contains high levels of sulfur dioxide.
  C) the continuing and increasing impact of nitrogen deposition.
  D) the increased reliance on high sulfur coal by the power industries.



mk6555

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 310
Answer to Question 1

B

Answer to Question 2

C



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Essential fatty acids have been shown to be effective against ulcers, asthma, dental cavities, and skin disorders such as acne.

Did you know?

The heart is located in the center of the chest, with part of it tipped slightly so that it taps against the left side of the chest.

Did you know?

In most cases, kidneys can recover from almost complete loss of function, such as in acute kidney (renal) failure.

Did you know?

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends that all women age 65 years of age or older should be screened with bone densitometry.

Did you know?

It is important to read food labels and choose foods with low cholesterol and saturated trans fat. You should limit saturated fat to no higher than 6% of daily calories.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library