[Answered] Systematic variation in an experiment may be due to: a. the independent variable. b. confounds. ...

This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Systematic variation in an experiment may be due to: a. the independent variable. b. confounds. ... (Read 35 times)

crazycityslicker

Hero Member
Posts: 537

on: Jun 20, 2018

Systematic variation in an experiment may be due to:

a. the independent variable.
b. confounds.
c. the independent variable and confounds.
d. error.

Question 2

In every experiment there are individual differences between participants. This variation is:

a. systematic.
b. unsystematic.
c. systematic error.
d. nonsystematic error.

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question

Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

frre432

Sr. Member
Posts: 347

Reply #1 on: Jun 20, 2018

Answer to Question 1

C

Answer to Question 2

D

crazycityslicker

Member
Posts: 537

Reply 2 on: Jun 20, 2018

Great answer, keep it coming

Mochi

Member
Posts: 300

Reply 3 on: Yesterday

TYSM

« previous next »

Did you know?

Anti-aging claims should not ever be believed. There is no supplement, medication, or any other substance that has been proven to slow or stop the aging process.

Did you know?

Individuals are never “cured” of addictions. Instead, they learn how to manage their disease to lead healthy, balanced lives.

Did you know?

Signs and symptoms that may signify an eye tumor include general blurred vision, bulging eye(s), double vision, a sensation of a foreign body in the eye(s), iris defects, limited ability to move the eyelid(s), limited ability to move the eye(s), pain or discomfort in or around the eyes or eyelids, red or pink eyes, white or cloud spots on the eye(s), colored spots on the eyelid(s), swelling around the eyes, swollen eyelid(s), and general vision loss.

Did you know?

Earwax has antimicrobial properties that reduce the viability of bacteria and fungus in the human ear.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).