Author Question: The advantage of the Latin Square technique over complete counterbalancing is that a. It better ... (Read 53 times)

Deast7027

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 538
The advantage of the Latin Square technique over complete counterbalancing is that
 
  a. It better controls for carryover effects
  b. It is more easy to assign people to groups
  c. It has all possible permutations of the conditions
  d. It permits more flexibility in choosing the number of subjects

Question 2

If counterbalancing within subjects does not seem possible in a within-subjects experiment, the you may consider controlling for order and sequence effects
 
  a. By giving everyone the same sequence in the same order
  b. With a Latin-square design
  c. Through reverse reliability
  d. Within the group



ryansturges

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 338
Answer to Question 1

d

Answer to Question 2

d



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Most strokes are caused when blood clots move to a blood vessel in the brain and block blood flow to that area. Thrombolytic therapy can be used to dissolve the clot quickly. If given within 3 hours of the first stroke symptoms, this therapy can help limit stroke damage and disability.

Did you know?

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends that all women age 65 years of age or older should be screened with bone densitometry.

Did you know?

Stroke kills people from all ethnic backgrounds, but the people at highest risk for fatal strokes are: black men, black women, Asian men, white men, and white women.

Did you know?

To combat osteoporosis, changes in lifestyle and diet are recommended. At-risk patients should include 1,200 to 1,500 mg of calcium daily either via dietary means or with supplements.

Did you know?

When Gabriel Fahrenheit invented the first mercury thermometer, he called "zero degrees" the lowest temperature he was able to attain with a mixture of ice and salt. For the upper point of his scale, he used 96°, which he measured as normal human body temperature (we know it to be 98.6° today because of more accurate thermometers).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library