[Answered] It is possible for a very small treatment effect to be a statistically significant treatment effect. ...

This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: It is possible for a very small treatment effect to be a statistically significant treatment effect. ... (Read 67 times)

Lobcity

Hero Member
Posts: 524

on: Jun 20, 2018

It is possible for a very small treatment effect to be a statistically significant treatment effect.

Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

The value obtained for Cohen's d is independent of the sample size.

Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question

Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

macagn

Sr. Member
Posts: 345

Reply #1 on: Jun 20, 2018

Answer to Question 1

T

Answer to Question 2

T

Lobcity

Member
Posts: 524

Reply 2 on: Jun 20, 2018

Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

carojassy25

Member
Posts: 299

Reply 3 on: Yesterday

Excellent

« previous next »

Did you know?

Adult head lice are gray, about ? inch long, and often have a tiny dot on their backs. A female can lay between 50 and 150 eggs within the several weeks that she is alive. They feed on human blood.

Did you know?

Russia has the highest death rate from cardiovascular disease followed by the Ukraine, Romania, Hungary, and Poland.

Did you know?

Malaria was not eliminated in the United States until 1951. The term eliminated means that no new cases arise in a country for 3 years.

Did you know?

The first war in which wide-scale use of anesthetics occurred was the Civil War, and 80% of all wounds were in the extremities.

Did you know?

To prove that stomach ulcers were caused by bacteria and not by stress, a researcher consumed an entire laboratory beaker full of bacterial culture. After this, he did indeed develop stomach ulcers, and won the Nobel Prize for his discovery.