This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: A study of changing speed limits in the United States finds no evidence that higher limits fuel more ... (Read 43 times)

panfilo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 572
A study of changing speed limits in the United States finds no evidence that higher limits fuel more deaths. A scientist examined shifts in speed limit laws over the past few decades. Highway speed limits were initially throttled in the 1970s in response to the gas shortage. In the 1980s the focus shifted to public safety. Yet in 1995, Congress returned all speed limit authority back to the states, and many states raised their top highway speeds. While limits ranged from 75 mph to 55 and back again, no significant increase in fatalities per mile driven are evident. In fact, from 1968 to 1991, the fatality rate per 100 million miles declined by 63.2 percent. The scientist attributes the decrease to safer cars, increased use of seat belts, an increase in the minimum legal drinking age, and better road maintenance. Automobile safety features and enforcement emerge as important factors in increasing highway safety, the scientist contends. Speed limits are far less important. In the study safer cars, increased use of seat belts, an increase in the minimum legal drinking age, and better road maintenance are mentioned as reasons for a decline in the fatality rate between 1968 and 1991 . What do we call these 4 variables?
 a. Response variables
  b. Qualitative variables
  c. Confounding variables
  d. Interacting variables

Question 2

A study of changing speed limits in the United States finds no evidence that higher limits fuel more deaths. A scientist examined shifts in speed limit laws over the past few decades. Highway speed limits were initially throttled in the 1970s in response to the gas shortage. In the 1980s the focus shifted to public safety. Yet in 1995, Congress returned all speed limit authority back to the states, and many states raised their top highway speeds. While limits ranged from 75 mph to 55 and back again, no significant increase in fatalities per mile driven are evident. In fact, from 1968 to 1991, the fatality rate per 100 million miles declined by 63.2 percent. The scientist attributes the decrease to safer cars, increased use of seat belts, an increase in the minimum legal drinking age, and better road maintenance. Automobile safety features and enforcement emerge as important factors in increasing highway safety, the scientist contends. Speed limits are far less important. What type of study is described above?
 a. Prospective observational, because we already know that the speed limits were changed at the beginning of the study. We have to wait and see if the fatality rate has changed.
  b. Retrospective observational, because records were studied going all the way back to the 1970's.
  c. An experiment, people have to actively drive their cars at these different speed limits.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

chevyboi1976

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 344
Answer to Question 1

D

Answer to Question 2

B




panfilo

  • Member
  • Posts: 572
Reply 2 on: Jul 24, 2018
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review


hramirez205

  • Member
  • Posts: 345
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Gracias!

 

Did you know?

More than 20 million Americans cite use of marijuana within the past 30 days, according to the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). More than 8 million admit to using it almost every day.

Did you know?

The heart is located in the center of the chest, with part of it tipped slightly so that it taps against the left side of the chest.

Did you know?

About one in five American adults and teenagers have had a genital herpes infection—and most of them don't know it. People with genital herpes have at least twice the risk of becoming infected with HIV if exposed to it than those people who do not have genital herpes.

Did you know?

Though newer “smart” infusion pumps are increasingly becoming more sophisticated, they cannot prevent all programming and administration errors. Health care professionals that use smart infusion pumps must still practice the rights of medication administration and have other professionals double-check all high-risk infusions.

Did you know?

Patients who cannot swallow may receive nutrition via a parenteral route—usually, a catheter is inserted through the chest into a large vein going into the heart.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library