This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Explain how the results of a very small study can be misleading. (Assume data quality is not an ... (Read 61 times)

kwoodring

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 560
Explain how the results of a very small study can be misleading. (Assume data quality is not an issue.)

Question 2

Is there such a thing as a sample size that was too large, in terms of producing misleading conclusions about the population? __________ (choose: yes, no)
 Fill in the blank(s) with correct word



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

amcvicar

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 341
Answer to Question 1

IF THE SAMPLE SIZE IS TOO SMALL, AN IMPORTANT RELATIONSHIP OR DIFFERENCE CAN GO UNDETECTED.

Answer to Question 2

YES




kwoodring

  • Member
  • Posts: 560
Reply 2 on: Jul 24, 2018
:D TYSM


Dinolord

  • Member
  • Posts: 313
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Wow, this really help

 

Did you know?

Earwax has antimicrobial properties that reduce the viability of bacteria and fungus in the human ear.

Did you know?

Asthma is the most common chronic childhood disease in the world. Most children who develop asthma have symptoms before they are 5 years old.

Did you know?

Excessive alcohol use costs the country approximately $235 billion every year.

Did you know?

Malaria was not eliminated in the United States until 1951. The term eliminated means that no new cases arise in a country for 3 years.

Did you know?

Cocaine was isolated in 1860 and first used as a local anesthetic in 1884. Its first clinical use was by Sigmund Freud to wean a patient from morphine addiction. The fictional character Sherlock Holmes was supposed to be addicted to cocaine by injection.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library