This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Suppose there is not enough evidence to conclude that the relationship in the population is real. ... (Read 54 times)

pane00

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 579
Suppose there is not enough evidence to conclude that the relationship in the population is real. Which of the following is not an equivalent way of saying this?
 a. The relationship is not statistically significant.
  b. We cannot reject the null hypothesis.
  c. We accept the null hypothesis.
  d. All of the above.

Question 2

Suppose researchers say they failed to find a relationship' between two variables that they thought might have been related. What does this say to you, as an educated consumer of statistical information?
 a. You should check to make sure the study was not based on a small number of individuals.
  b. The researchers must not have observed any relationship in their sample.
  c. There must be no relationship between these two variables in the population.
  d. All of the above.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

Pamela.irrgang@yahoo.com

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 323
Answer to Question 1

C

Answer to Question 2

A



pane00

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 579
Both answers were spot on, thank you once again




 

Did you know?

Essential fatty acids have been shown to be effective against ulcers, asthma, dental cavities, and skin disorders such as acne.

Did you know?

Individuals are never “cured” of addictions. Instead, they learn how to manage their disease to lead healthy, balanced lives.

Did you know?

Vaccines cause herd immunity. If the majority of people in a community have been vaccinated against a disease, an unvaccinated person is less likely to get the disease since others are less likely to become sick from it and spread the disease.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

Did you know?

In ancient Rome, many of the richer people in the population had lead-induced gout. The reason for this is unclear. Lead poisoning has also been linked to madness.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library