This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Explain what is wrong with the statement, The mean is always the best measure of central ... (Read 46 times)

123654777

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 585
Explain what is wrong with the statement, The mean is always the best measure of central tendency..

Question 2

In an ogive, what does the horizontal scale identify?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

fur

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 309
Answer to Question 1

It depends on the type of data, and what would be an appropriate measure of central tendency.

Answer to Question 2

The horizontal scale identifies the upper class boundaries. Until the upper boundary of a class has been reached, you cannot be sure you have accumulated all the data in that class. Therefore, the horizontal scale for an ogive is always based on the upper class boundaries.




123654777

  • Member
  • Posts: 585
Reply 2 on: Jul 24, 2018
Excellent


parker125

  • Member
  • Posts: 332
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

 

Did you know?

More than 30% of American adults, and about 12% of children utilize health care approaches that were developed outside of conventional medicine.

Did you know?

Green tea is able to stop the scent of garlic or onion from causing bad breath.

Did you know?

In 1864, the first barbiturate (barbituric acid) was synthesized.

Did you know?

A serious new warning has been established for pregnant women against taking ACE inhibitors during pregnancy. In the study, the risk of major birth defects in children whose mothers took ACE inhibitors during the first trimester was nearly three times higher than in children whose mothers didn't take ACE inhibitors. Physicians can prescribe alternative medications for pregnant women who have symptoms of high blood pressure.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library