This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Forty subjects are asked about their preferred method to obtain the national news daily. They ... (Read 53 times)

LCritchfi

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 519
Forty subjects are asked about their preferred method to obtain the national news daily. They respond in five categories; national newspaper, local newspaper, internet, nightly TV news, or from another individual.
  The test statistic was computed to be X2 = 8.25. What is the correct statistical interpretation of this value at the =0.10 level?
  1.Fail to reject the null.
  2.Reject the null.

Question 2

Forty subjects are asked about their preferred method to obtain the national news daily. They respond in five categories; national newspaper, local newspaper, internet, nightly TV news, or from another individual. If the observed values are all very close to the expected values, the X2 statistic should be ______.
  1.relatively large
  2.more extreme than X2 critical
  3.negative
  4.close to zero



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

covalentbond

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 336
Answer to Question 1

2

Answer to Question 2

4




LCritchfi

  • Member
  • Posts: 519
Reply 2 on: Jul 24, 2018
Wow, this really help


cassie_ragen

  • Member
  • Posts: 347
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review

 

Did you know?

The human body produces and destroys 15 million blood cells every second.

Did you know?

There are actually 60 minerals, 16 vitamins, 12 essential amino acids, and three essential fatty acids that your body needs every day.

Did you know?

Medication errors are more common among seriously ill patients than with those with minor conditions.

Did you know?

Approximately 15–25% of recognized pregnancies end in miscarriage. However, many miscarriages often occur before a woman even knows she is pregnant.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library