This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Stanley Milgram, in his studies of obedience to authority, has been criticized for pressuring his ... (Read 99 times)

moongchi

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 516
Stanley Milgram, in his studies of obedience to authority, has been criticized for pressuring his subjects to continue shocking the learner by stating, You have no other choice, you must go on.
 
  In terms of the current APA codes of ethical behavior, Milgram most directly violated the principle of
 
   a. offering inducements for research participation.
   b. informed consent for recording voices and images in research.
   c. boundaries of competence.
   d. delegation of work to others.

Question 2

If an institution's IRB recommends that a research proposal be reviewed, what are the two possible levels of review?
 
  a. complete; incomplete
  b. expedited; full
  c. simple; complex
  d. unidimensional; multidimensional



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

smrerig

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 325
Answer to Question 1

a

Answer to Question 2

b




moongchi

  • Member
  • Posts: 516
Reply 2 on: Jun 20, 2018
:D TYSM


adammoses97

  • Member
  • Posts: 337
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Wow, this really help

 

Did you know?

The ratio of hydrogen atoms to oxygen in water (H2O) is 2:1.

Did you know?

Today, nearly 8 out of 10 pregnant women living with HIV (about 1.1 million), receive antiretrovirals.

Did you know?

Glaucoma is a leading cause of blindness. As of yet, there is no cure. Everyone is at risk, and there may be no warning signs. It is six to eight times more common in African Americans than in whites. The best and most effective way to detect glaucoma is to receive a dilated eye examination.

Did you know?

Approximately 70% of expectant mothers report experiencing some symptoms of morning sickness during the first trimester of pregnancy.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library