This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Why are there few quasars at low redshifts and at high redshifts but many at redshifts of about 2? ... (Read 89 times)

panfilo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 572
Why are there few quasars at low redshifts and at high redshifts but many at redshifts of about 2?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Planetary nebulae are sites of planet formation.
 
  a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

karmakat49

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 369
Answer to Question 1

Quasars are most common with redshifts over 2 and less common with redshifts above 3 . The largest quasar redshifts are over 6, but such high-redshift quasars are rare. Evidently astronomers see few quasars at high redshifts because they are looking back to an age when the Universe was so young it had not yet formed many galaxies. At redshifts between 2 and 3, galaxies were actively growing and colliding, and quasars were about 1000 times more common than they are now.

Answer to Question 2

False




panfilo

  • Member
  • Posts: 572
Reply 2 on: Jul 27, 2018
:D TYSM


bimper21

  • Member
  • Posts: 309
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Gracias!

 

Did you know?

Anesthesia awareness is a potentially disturbing adverse effect wherein patients who have been paralyzed with muscle relaxants may awaken. They may be aware of their surroundings but unable to communicate or move. Neurologic monitoring equipment that helps to more closely check the patient's anesthesia stages is now available to avoid the occurrence of anesthesia awareness.

Did you know?

More than nineteen million Americans carry the factor V gene that causes blood clots, pulmonary embolism, and heart disease.

Did you know?

Pubic lice (crabs) are usually spread through sexual contact. You cannot catch them by using a public toilet.

Did you know?

If all the neurons in the human body were lined up, they would stretch more than 600 miles.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library