This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Mistakenly rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true and should not have been rejected is ... (Read 37 times)

iveyjurea

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 555
Mistakenly rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true and should not have been rejected is technically called a(n)
 
  a. Type I error.
  b. Type II error.
  c. alpha error.
  d. beta error.

Question 2

At the beginning of a study, the researcher hypothesizes that there is no difference between the experimental and control groups. This is an example of a(n)
 
  a. Type I error.
  b. null hypothesis.
  c. alternative hypothesis.
  d. significant hypothesis.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

JCABRERA33

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 344
Answer to Question 1

a

Answer to Question 2

b




iveyjurea

  • Member
  • Posts: 555
Reply 2 on: Jun 20, 2018
Excellent


elyse44

  • Member
  • Posts: 319
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review

 

Did you know?

The effects of organophosphate poisoning are referred to by using the abbreviations “SLUD” or “SLUDGE,” It stands for: salivation, lacrimation, urination, defecation, GI upset, and emesis.

Did you know?

The oldest recorded age was 122. Madame Jeanne Calment was born in France in 1875 and died in 1997. She was a vegetarian and loved olive oil, port wine, and chocolate.

Did you know?

There are immediate benefits of chiropractic adjustments that are visible via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). It shows that spinal manipulation therapy is effective in decreasing pain and increasing the gaps between the vertebrae, reducing pressure that leads to pain.

Did you know?

Addicts to opiates often avoid treatment because they are afraid of withdrawal. Though unpleasant, with proper management, withdrawal is rarely fatal and passes relatively quickly.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library