This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: No stars are expected with masses greater than 150 times our Sun because A) they would fragment ... (Read 110 times)

lilldybug07

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 546
No stars are expected with masses greater than 150 times our Sun because
 
  A) they would fragment into binary stars because of their rapid rotation.
  B) they would be too massive for hydrogen fusion to occur in their cores.
  C) molecular clouds do not have enough material to form such massive stars.
  D) they would generate so much power that they would blow themselves apart.
  E) they would shine exclusively at X-ray wavelengths and would be difficult to detect.

Question 2

A planet is most likely to have tectonic activity if it has
 
  A) high surface gravity.
  B) high internal temperature.
  C) a dense atmosphere.
  D) low surface gravity.
  E) low internal temperature.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

xMRAZ

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 363
Answer to Question 1

D

Answer to Question 2

B





 

Did you know?

The most destructive flu epidemic of all times in recorded history occurred in 1918, with approximately 20 million deaths worldwide.

Did you know?

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends that all women age 65 years of age or older should be screened with bone densitometry.

Did you know?

Disorders that may affect pharmacodynamics include genetic mutations, malnutrition, thyrotoxicosis, myasthenia gravis, Parkinson's disease, and certain forms of insulin-resistant diabetes mellitus.

Did you know?

There are more bacteria in your mouth than there are people in the world.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library