This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: How much more energy would be required to bring the entire world up to the average per capita U.S. ... (Read 19 times)

hubes95

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 561
How much more energy would be required to bring the entire world up to the average per capita U.S. energy use? Recall that world average energy use is 57 GJ per capita and the U.S. average energy use is 300 GJ per capita.
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

In Bt corn, genetic material from a bacterium has been put into the corn itself. What consequences might ensue?
 
  What will be an ideal response?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

tkempin

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 332
Answer to Question 1

The United States has a population of about 280 million. The world population is
approximately 6 billion. So, 6 billion times 57 GJ is 342 EJ, which is the current world use,
while if everyone were consuming at the U.S. consumption rate of 300 GJ per person this

Answer to Question 2

In Bt corn, the additional genetic material works against the European corn borer
by creating a protein that kills borer larvae. There are several problems. First, evolution will
eventually lead to development of resistance in the corn borer. Second, the pollen from the
Bt corn can drift and affect nearby corn crops.
In a controversial paper (Quist and Chapela, Nature, 2001; referenced in the book), it was
reported that Bt corn genes were transferred to other cops in Mexico. The paper generated
many critiques, but some of its main points remain still considered valid, even though the
publication withdrew it.
According to H. Hall, Bt corn: is it worth the risk?, The Science Creative Quarterly,
issue 2, Sept.-Nov. 2006, These benefits, real or imagined, have been used as leverage by
Bt corn proponents in the argument to accept what they argue are minimal levels of health
and environmental risk. Yet many consumer, civil rights, and environmental advocacy
groups characterize such arguments as industry propaganda, asserting that corporate
benefits should not out-weigh the undetermined human health, socioeconomic and
environmental risks. In the last analysis, we do not really know the risks, and proceeding
with Bt use is a reliance on hope that the designers knew what they were doing and that any
deleterious consequences will be minor.





 

Did you know?

In 2006, a generic antinausea drug named ondansetron was approved. It is used to stop nausea and vomiting associated with surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy.

Did you know?

Alcohol acts as a diuretic. Eight ounces of water is needed to metabolize just 1 ounce of alcohol.

Did you know?

Only one in 10 cancer deaths is caused by the primary tumor. The vast majority of cancer mortality is caused by cells breaking away from the main tumor and metastasizing to other parts of the body, such as the brain, bones, or liver.

Did you know?

Barbituric acid, the base material of barbiturates, was first synthesized in 1863 by Adolph von Bayer. His company later went on to synthesize aspirin for the first time, and Bayer aspirin is still a popular brand today.

Did you know?

The first monoclonal antibodies were made exclusively from mouse cells. Some are now fully human, which means they are likely to be safer and may be more effective than older monoclonal antibodies.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library