This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In a study by Posner, Welton, & Goldsmith (1967), participants saw a bunch of dot patterns, and ... (Read 84 times)

altibaby

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 562
In a study by Posner, Welton, & Goldsmith (1967), participants saw a bunch of dot patterns, and then later had to classify them as previously seen or unseen.
 
  When participants saw a dot pattern that resembled all of the
   other ones, but that wasn't presented, they still tended to classify it as previously seen. This finding supports:
   a) exemplar approach.
   b) the essentialist view.
   c) prototype approach.
   d) the classical view.

Question 2

Which of these views of categorization CANNOT explain why the majority of individuals gives carrot as one of their first examples of a vegetable?
 
  a) the exemplar view
   b) the classical view
   c) the prototype view
   d) the essentialist view



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

fatboyy09

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 358
Answer to Question 1

Answer: c

Answer to Question 2

Answer: b




altibaby

  • Member
  • Posts: 562
Reply 2 on: Jun 20, 2018
Gracias!


brbarasa

  • Member
  • Posts: 308
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

 

Did you know?

Medication errors are three times higher among children and infants than with adults.

Did you know?

Cancer has been around as long as humankind, but only in the second half of the twentieth century did the number of cancer cases explode.

Did you know?

Acute bronchitis is an inflammation of the breathing tubes (bronchi), which causes increased mucus production and other changes. It is usually caused by bacteria or viruses, can be serious in people who have pulmonary or cardiac diseases, and can lead to pneumonia.

Did you know?

The modern decimal position system was the invention of the Hindus (around 800 AD), involving the placing of numerals to indicate their value (units, tens, hundreds, and so on).

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library