Author Question: A low-power source of energy could put out a lot of work provided it A) exerted its power over a ... (Read 123 times)

cool

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 570
A low-power source of energy could put out a lot of work provided it
 
  A) exerted its power over a very large distance.
  B) operated for a short time.
  C) operated for a long time.
  D) exerted a sufficiently strong force.
  E) Nonsense-- there is no way that a low-power source can put out a large amount of work.

Question 2

It takes 87 J of work to stretch an ideal spring from 1.4 m to 2.9 m from equilibrium. What is the value of the spring constant (force constant) of this spring?
 
  A) 52 N/m B) 77 N/m C) 39 N/m D) 27 N/m


asdfasdf

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 339
Answer to Question 1

C

Answer to Question 2

D



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question


 

Did you know?

People with alcoholism are at a much greater risk of malnutrition than are other people and usually exhibit low levels of most vitamins (especially folic acid). This is because alcohol often takes the place of 50% of their daily intake of calories, with little nutritional value contained in it.

Did you know?

Autoimmune diseases occur when the immune system destroys its own healthy tissues. When this occurs, white blood cells cannot distinguish between pathogens and normal cells.

Did you know?

A seasonal flu vaccine is the best way to reduce the chances you will get seasonal influenza and spread it to others.

Did you know?

Oliver Wendell Holmes is credited with introducing the words "anesthesia" and "anesthetic" into the English language in 1846.

Did you know?

Pope Sylvester II tried to introduce Arabic numbers into Europe between the years 999 and 1003, but their use did not catch on for a few more centuries, and Roman numerals continued to be the primary number system.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library