This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: What does Duke (2000) argue could be the reason why children have difficulty with informational ... (Read 156 times)

Zulu123

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 525
What does Duke (2000) argue could be the reason why children have difficulty with informational reading and writing later in school, the fourth-grade slump for example?
 
  a. Hormones and growth spurts.
  b. A lack of quality childrens literature in libraries.
  c. Extensive use of basal reading books in primary grades.
  d. Limited exposure to information texts.

Question 2

What should be included in an information book to ensure credibility?
 
  a. References and acknowledgements.
  b. Illustrations to add to the understanding of the text.
  c. A writing style to engage the reader.
  d. All of the above



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

bubulittle310@msn.cn

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 281
Answer to Question 1

d

Answer to Question 2

d



Zulu123

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 525
Both answers were spot on, thank you once again




 

Did you know?

When Gabriel Fahrenheit invented the first mercury thermometer, he called "zero degrees" the lowest temperature he was able to attain with a mixture of ice and salt. For the upper point of his scale, he used 96°, which he measured as normal human body temperature (we know it to be 98.6° today because of more accurate thermometers).

Did you know?

Most fungi that pathogenically affect humans live in soil. If a person is not healthy, has an open wound, or is immunocompromised, a fungal infection can be very aggressive.

Did you know?

The effects of organophosphate poisoning are referred to by using the abbreviations “SLUD” or “SLUDGE,” It stands for: salivation, lacrimation, urination, defecation, GI upset, and emesis.

Did you know?

Intradermal injections are somewhat difficult to correctly administer because the skin layers are so thin that it is easy to accidentally punch through to the deeper subcutaneous layer.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library