This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: The alternative hypothesis for the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test is H1: . a. The population ... (Read 60 times)

bb

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 544
The alternative hypothesis for the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test is H1: .
 
  a. The population distributions of the related A1 and A2 conditions are identical
  b. The population distributions of the related A1 and A2 conditions are notidentical
 c.    A A 1 2
  d. The row and column variables are related in the population

Question 2

The null hypothesis for the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test is H0: .
 
  a. The population distributions of the related A1 and A2 conditions are identical
  b. The population distributions of the related A1 and A2 conditions are notidentical
 c.  =  A A 1 2
  d. The row and column variables are independent in the population



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

Swizqar

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 357
Answer to Question 1

B

Answer to Question 2

A




bb

  • Member
  • Posts: 544
Reply 2 on: Aug 1, 2018
Great answer, keep it coming :)


Animal_Goddess

  • Member
  • Posts: 339
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Wow, this really help

 

Did you know?

The average adult has about 21 square feet of skin.

Did you know?

Only one in 10 cancer deaths is caused by the primary tumor. The vast majority of cancer mortality is caused by cells breaking away from the main tumor and metastasizing to other parts of the body, such as the brain, bones, or liver.

Did you know?

Patients who have been on total parenteral nutrition for more than a few days may need to have foods gradually reintroduced to give the digestive tract time to start working again.

Did you know?

The strongest synthetic topical retinoid drug available, tazarotene, is used to treat sun-damaged skin, acne, and psoriasis.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library