Which is not a cost-benefit analysis factor? A) The probability of winning or losing. B) The ...

Author Question: Which is not a cost-benefit analysis factor? A) The probability of winning or losing. B) The ... (Read 61 times)

javeds

Hero Member
Posts: 570

on: Aug 2, 2018

Which is not a cost-benefit analysis factor?

A) The probability of winning or losing.
B) The lawyer's fees and other litigation costs.
C) The facts of the case are curious.
D) The unpredictability of the legal system.

Question 2

Statutes at the federal level provide a list of titles and chapter headings in an index for ease of use.

Indicate whether the statement is true or false

b614102004

Sr. Member
Posts: 320

Reply #1 on: Aug 2, 2018

Answer to Question 1

C

Answer to Question 2

T

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question

« previous next »

Did you know?

The use of salicylates dates back 2,500 years to Hippocrates's recommendation of willow bark (from which a salicylate is derived) as an aid to the pains of childbirth. However, overdosage of salicylates can harm body fluids, electrolytes, the CNS, the GI tract, the ears, the lungs, the blood, the liver, and the kidneys and cause coma or death.

Did you know?

Blastomycosis is often misdiagnosed, resulting in tragic outcomes. It is caused by a fungus living in moist soil, in wooded areas of the United States and Canada. If inhaled, the fungus can cause mild breathing problems that may worsen and cause serious illness and even death.

Did you know?

In the United States, an estimated 50 million unnecessary antibiotics are prescribed for viral respiratory infections.

Did you know?

Pink eye is a term that refers to conjunctivitis, which is inflammation of the thin, clear membrane (conjunctiva) over the white part of the eye (sclera). It may be triggered by a virus, bacteria, or foreign body in the eye. Antibiotic eye drops alleviate bacterial conjunctivitis, and antihistamine allergy pills or eye drops help control allergic conjunctivitis symptoms.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.