Answer to Question 1
Marvin Nash executed his will while still married to his ex-wife, Vicki Nash, in 1994 . Marvin's will included Shelley Tedder (Vicki's daughter) as a contingent beneficiary. Marvin did not execute a new will after he divorced Vicki Nash. The court's interpretation of Texas Probate Code 69 was that all provisions under the will with respect to the former spouse be read as if the former spouse failed to survive the testator and should be void and have no effect. The court's holding was that the contingent bequest to Shelley Tedder was not a provision to a former spouse and so did not fall under 69 but that Tedder did not take under the will and Nash's estate had to pass under intestacy. This illustrates that not only should a person execute a will directing who should inherit from the estate upon death; but also that people must revisit their will often to make sure that circumstances have not changed warranting revisions to the will. It could be that Marvin Nash did not update his will because he still wanted his ex-wife and stepdaughter to inherit; however the laws in most states assume that divorced people no longer want their ex-spouse to inherit and contain provisions similar to Texas Probate Code 69 striking provisions to former spouses.
Answer to Question 2
TRUE
The logistic growth model does not describe all populations.
The following terms describe types of body movement that occur at the diarthrotic joints
Carrie Mae Weems, A Negroid Type, from the series From Here I Saw What Happened and I Cried.
The chromosome locations for BRCA1 and BRCA2. Together, these genes account for the majority of case
Describe the Conceptual Forecasting Framework in your own words.
The family described in Example Case 3