This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: The idiographic approach to personality has advantages. For example, A. researchers can compare ... (Read 80 times)

itsmyluck

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 546
The idiographic approach to personality has advantages. For example,
 
  A. researchers can compare all people on measures of a certain trait.
  B. it reveals common traits.
  C. the person rather than the researcher determines what traits to examine.
  D. it provides information about the relationship between traits and behavior.

Question 2

According to Allport, which of the following is true about central traits?
 
  A. They are basically the same for all people.
  B. They are useful when examining personality through the nomothetic approach.
  C. They are useful when examining personality through the idiographic approach.
  D. They are comprised of a number of secondary traits.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

fraziera112

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 356
Answer to Question 1

C

Answer to Question 2

C




itsmyluck

  • Member
  • Posts: 546
Reply 2 on: Jun 21, 2018
Excellent


rleezy04

  • Member
  • Posts: 322
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Great answer, keep it coming :)

 

Did you know?

Multiple experimental evidences have confirmed that at the molecular level, cancer is caused by lesions in cellular DNA.

Did you know?

A headache when you wake up in the morning is indicative of sinusitis. Other symptoms of sinusitis can include fever, weakness, tiredness, a cough that may be more severe at night, and a runny nose or nasal congestion.

Did you know?

Blood in the urine can be a sign of a kidney stone, glomerulonephritis, or other kidney problems.

Did you know?

The term pharmacology is derived from the Greek words pharmakon("claim, medicine, poison, or remedy") and logos ("study").

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library