This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Since field settings are NOT exactly like the laboratory situation, laboratory findings cannot ... (Read 100 times)

khang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 569
Since field settings are NOT exactly like the laboratory situation, laboratory findings cannot easily be assumed to have
 
  A) internal validity.
  B) construct validity.
  C) external validity.
  D) criterion-related validity.

Question 2

Cook and Campbell (1979) noted that
 
  A) measures used in the field are often invalid.
  B) researchers cannot assume that findings from the lab will hold in the field.
  C) field research is not reliable and should not be used to answer questions of causality.
  D) All of the above



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

miss.ashley

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 371
Answer to Question 1

Answer: C

Answer to Question 2

Answer: B




khang

  • Member
  • Posts: 569
Reply 2 on: Aug 4, 2018
:D TYSM


rachel

  • Member
  • Posts: 323
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

 

Did you know?

In women, pharmacodynamic differences include increased sensitivity to (and increased effectiveness of) beta-blockers, opioids, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and typical antipsychotics.

Did you know?

Essential fatty acids have been shown to be effective against ulcers, asthma, dental cavities, and skin disorders such as acne.

Did you know?

The human body produces and destroys 15 million blood cells every second.

Did you know?

Oliver Wendell Holmes is credited with introducing the words "anesthesia" and "anesthetic" into the English language in 1846.

Did you know?

Calcitonin is a naturally occurring hormone. In women who are at least 5 years beyond menopause, it slows bone loss and increases spinal bone density.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library