Author Question: What do you think of Reebok's response to the disaster? What will be an ideal ... (Read 54 times)

shenderson6

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 573
What do you think of Reebok's response to the disaster?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Has the boycott against Nestl been a success or a failure? What do you think of the practice of using an economic boycott as a tactic to influence a company's actions?
 
  What will be an ideal response?



nicoleclaire22

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 318
Answer to Question 1

Admitting that a mistake had been made and that it ran contrary to the company's
values was probably the best thing it could do under the circumstances. Reebok
scored well for honesty and humility.

Answer to Question 2

It depends on how one chooses to measure success. As the Financial Times noted,
from an economic standpoint, the boycott appears to have been ineffective.
However, in terms of the company's reputation, the continuing boycott has been
an unqualified success. The fact that we are still writing about it nearly three
decades after it began is as much a testament to boycott's staying power as it is to
the company's stubbornness. Economic boycotts should be an act of last resort. Innocent people not involved in a company's decision-making processes can get
hurt. However, in a democratic society, people are free to choose with whom they associate. Boycotts usually happen when communication fails. For those who value money over principles, an economic boycott is often the only language they hear.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

The term pharmacology is derived from the Greek words pharmakon("claim, medicine, poison, or remedy") and logos ("study").

Did you know?

The longest a person has survived after a heart transplant is 24 years.

Did you know?

Medication errors are more common among seriously ill patients than with those with minor conditions.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

Did you know?

About one in five American adults and teenagers have had a genital herpes infection—and most of them don't know it. People with genital herpes have at least twice the risk of becoming infected with HIV if exposed to it than those people who do not have genital herpes.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library